Reply to Letter to the Editor by Griffiths et al. commenting on Evans & Allen
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Reply to Letter to the Editor by Griffiths et al. commenting on Evans & Allen
to the number in which no significant effect was found has been criticised by a number of reviewers and is not the approach advocated by the Cochrane Collaboration. Although we have outlined above a number of points with which we take issue in the Evans and Allen review, we would like to conclude by stating that we do not think the differences between our position and theirs are as great as mig...
متن کاملReply to Allen et al
Allen et al.’s results depend on their inclusion of children whose family at the time of their grade retention is unknown, plus adopted and foster children whose selection process into families is unknown. Children whose family has been through upheavals or transitions are less likely to make good progress in school than children from stable families. Children raised by stable same-sex couples ...
متن کاملLetter to the Editor Wolf Subspecies: Reply to Weckworth et al. and Fredrickson et al
Colleagues disagree with statements in our discussion (Cronin et al. 2015) regarding subspecies taxonomy of wolves (Canis lupus) in southeast Alaska (Weckworth et al. 2015) and the southwest United States (Fredrickson et al. 2015). Following the presentation of results of single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) variation in several populations of wolves in North America, we discussed other genetic...
متن کاملReply to the letter to the editor 'Journey to a faraway land' by Alkan et al.
supporting its role in CRC metastatic development [1]. However, the precise status of miR-29c in metastatic CRC tissues is a major question to be fully investigated. Thus, we quantified miR-29c in primary and paired metastatic tissues from 17 CRC patients, 12 with liver metastasis and 5 with lung metastasis, using Taqman Low Density Arrays (TLDAs) panel A (Applied Biosystems). A pathologist rev...
متن کاملReply to the letter to the editor by Bouyer et al. (2013).
Who is really misleading decision-makers about costffective approaches to tackling tsetse flies? Bouyer et al. (2013) claim we have given misleading dvice in our paper (Shaw et al., 2013) on the costs of ontrolling or eliminating riverine or savannah species of setse using various techniques, singly or in combination. e suggested that the most cost-effective option is often setse control, rathe...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Journal of Optometry
سال: 2017
ISSN: 1888-4296
DOI: 10.1016/j.optom.2017.05.001